If there exists a dedicated online platform for individuals to solicit honest evaluations of their physical appearance and allure through forums, why is it that whenever a user expresses their personal perspective, which may not align with that of the forum moderators, they are met with a warning or a permanent ban? This action is taken by moderators who appear to hold the belief that their own judgments are the only legitimate viewpoints, and that attractiveness is so formulaic that it can be reduced to a simplistic rating system ranging from 1 to 10, despite the lack of a universally accepted definition for attractiveness. It should be noted that attractiveness is a subjective construct that is influenced by a multitude of factors, and therefore cannot be accurately captured through a single rating system.
Also, it should be noted that the moderators in question are demonstrating a proclivity towards the practice of “Dogmatism,” an intellectual disposition that involves the assertion of subjective opinions or beliefs as objective and incontrovertible facts, often accompanied by an unwarranted or arrogantly positive tone. This approach is founded on premises that may not have undergone adequate scrutiny or examination, leading to a potentially flawed and untenable perspective or ideological system. Such dogmatic behavior is widely regarded as unprofessional and an impediment to constructive discourse.